🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the optimal pick for a daring scary movie focused on Jesus Christ, though not for the causes many audiences may think. Truthfully, Cage does not actually portray Jesus in the new film: the part he plays is listed only as a craftsman. Cage is framed as a father figure of this tale, attempting to maintain his faith while The Boy (acted by the young actor), his teenage foster child, starts to display supernatural abilities. The reason it’s difficult to picture any other prominent performer playing this part is that although his character grows burdened with numerous difficulties, the actor appears almost touchingly certain that this murky, bleak little movie is worth his time.

The Actor's Recent Career Choices

Cage has been using that time more carefully in recent years. He still stars in additional projects than most average viewers will ever see — as an illustration, were you informed that he has completed a trio of separate Westerns over the last few years? — however he also mixes in esteemed critically acclaimed roles like Dream Scenario, Pig, and Longlegs. This new film appears to be one of those, as it’s genre-adjacent, potentially provocative, and handles a over-the-top premise quite seriously.

The Film's Storyline and Direction

Regrettably, filmmaker Lotfy Nathan does not justify that serious attention. The Carpenter’s Son opens in a interestingly wandering place, marketed as inspired by an obscure religious text regarding Christ’s childhood. The Carpenter, the maternal figure, and their child move frequently, anxious of doctrinal intolerance or suspicion regarding their son's strange powers. “Disaster trails us,” Cage sadly observes. This persists as dark forces focus on the household at their new home, initiating on the well-known scriptural test for the youth.

Sometimes, this production echoes an Exorcist-style horror film, but none of the lead characters are explicitly taken over. On the contrary, they become more and more distant mutually, while these forces infect a resident female (the actress, named an outsider) that the son connects to, and presents each character disturbing images of a grim future. The Carpenter in particular grapples with his role in the narrative, sometimes scolding his child he doesn't completely grasp.

Discussion and Sensitivity

This material is apt to invite debate, and the director handles it with much delicacy — excessive, maybe. The notion of a adolescent dealing with his destined offering and seduced by dark influences is indeed terrifying, but the filmmaker could be cautious about appearing sensational and keen to indicate his goals, so he often retreats into gloomily threatening filming. Characters continually reflect — FKA Twigs, who showed genuine potential in a recent film update, interestingly — yields her role to her character's costume, sometimes broken up by some disturbing frightening scenes.

The Star's Portrayal and Film's Weaknesses

At the same time, Cage toy with just the sort of overacting that his more snickering appreciators might be looking for. One scene (shown) in previews in which he loses control and screams “My belief is broken!” Should such of theatrical release is included in your biblical thriller, maybe a more boldly ridiculous method would take better advantage of Cage’s willingness to exaggerate when necessary. Rather, the film echoes the poorer direct-to-video productions Cage made during the 2010s — excluding the campy action films but rather the dramas and paranormal movies that often seem intriguing, and often contain several notable memorable scenes, but finally come across like, frankly, cheap home video fare.

Truthfully, several of these, although simpler, were more watchable as a whole. At this point I have to break my own dogma, not religious but work-oriented: Long ago, a beloved editor urged me to banish words like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my reviewing language. These words express scant except a subjective and generically described restlessness, avoiding the duty of clearly expressing the intellectual and emotional experience of seeing an individual production. It's challenging to communicate monotony without sounding boring yourself. It's just as unclear as calling a movie “interesting.” “Explain further,” that is.

However, I admit, I was bored for a large part of The Carpenter’s Son. In its defense, it’s a churchy kind of dullness, not because this movie is moralizing, but because it demands a kind of obedient endurance to sit through it. After a while early on, the film settles into a monotonous pattern of simmering distress, and never really