🔗 Share this article

I possess some thoughts regarding the remarks made by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz during the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at the majors: none of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

We all enjoy a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if Fritz defeated the legend for the initial occasion, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the next round, who Fritz has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven grand slams (and Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz stated in press following his defeat that he actually liked his path, because it presented the chance to beat the three best competitors in the sport in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Serbian quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the world starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his last six matches over No 3 the German with growing comfort. Presumably he might claim that position for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class serve and powerful power on both front side and reverse side are more than enough to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is frequently helpless. The past few years has seen the interesting rise of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless move around with the alarming speed and fluidity of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite harsh restriction on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was the commentator thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the ongoing slump of American men winning grand slams when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The desperation is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz earning plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, extending the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use excessive effort to win it. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s primary delivery floated to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It was not a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of the Serbian, that was defeated by Alcaraz in the following match and never especially seem like he believed he could win. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities anymore, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is the individuals who were anticipating the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not done anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Player Divisions

Jimmy Connors Group

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Group

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying reign is in fact highly unlikely for everybody else. {